Conflicted
How Productive Disagreements Lead To Better Outcomes
by Ian Leslie
“Conflicted is not merely fascinating; it’s also important. It’s the right book at the right time, and Ian Leslie is clearly the right author for the job. If you encounter ideas that make you squirm—and you probably will—remember, that’s part of the point.”
Many of us have grown up believing conflict is something to avoid—a tense, uncomfortable scenario that derails meetings, sours relationships, and kills productivity. Yet, in Conflicted: How Productive Disagreements Lead to Better Outcomes, Ian Leslie flips the script on this longstanding assumption. According to Leslie, conflict doesn’t have to be detrimental; in fact, it can be the spark that drives creativity, fosters innovation, and refines our decision-making process—provided it’s harnessed and guided effectively.
Leslie’s central premise? We benefit most from disagreements when they’re productive and structured. Through a combination of rigorous research, historical anecdotes, and modern case studies, he demonstrates how constructive conflict can help us uncover blind spots, scrutinize our assumptions, and arrive at better solutions than consensus-based processes typically produce. Whether you’re leading a corporate team, negotiating a deal, or simply trying to navigate tough conversations in your personal life, the insights in Conflicted challenge the idea that harmony is always the ideal goal—and offer a compelling roadmap for when (and how) to lean into disagreement.
In this blog post, we’ll explore the core themes of Leslie’s book, share some real-world applications, and consider how embracing conflict might just be the key to unlocking better outcomes in work and life.
Main Themes
1. The Myth of “Conflict = Chaos”
For many, the term “conflict” triggers mental images of shouting matches and fractured relationships. Leslie acknowledges these pitfalls but points out that this chaotic form of conflict is only one possibility—and often a symptom of poor communication or emotional escalation rather than disagreement itself.
He cites examples of teams that avoid open disagreement for fear of tension, only to see their unspoken issues fester and erupt later. In contrast, groups that practice transparent, respectful dissent often maintain healthier dynamics in the long run. The difference isn’t whether disagreements exist; it’s whether they’re channeled constructively.
Key Insight: Conflict alone isn’t inherently harmful—unstructured or poorly managed conflict is. By learning techniques to keep discussions on track, we can harness disagreement as a powerful creative force.
2. Cognitive Diversity: A Catalyst for Breakthrough Ideas
A recurring theme in Conflicted is the value of cognitive diversity—assembling teams with varying backgrounds, perspectives, and thinking styles. While like-minded groups may reach consensus quickly, they risk groupthink, where important dissenting views are sidelined. Leslie emphasizes that friction between differing perspectives, when managed well, pushes ideas to evolve.
He references scientific panels, startup teams, and research labs as prime examples. In these environments, robust debate—grounded in respect for colleagues’ expertise—has often led to breakthroughs that would never have emerged in an echo chamber. By inviting tension around ideas, groups can refine theories, root out flaws, and ultimately arrive at stronger conclusions.
Key Insight: Cognitive diversity is wasted if disagreements are swept under the rug. A team that encourages respectful, idea-focused debate can leverage each member’s unique insights, enhancing problem-solving and innovation.
3. The Art of “Good-Faith” Disagreements
Leslie differentiates between two forms of conflict: good-faith and bad-faith. Good-faith disagreement involves a shared goal (e.g., finding the best solution), openness to changing one’s mind, and respect for the conversation’s participants. Bad-faith conflict, by contrast, is driven by ego, power plays, or a desire to humiliate opponents.
Good-Faith Conflict:
Participants focus on the issue at hand, not on personal attacks.
There’s a willingness to listen, learn, and incorporate new data.
The debate has clear rules or frameworks to prevent it from devolving into personal animosity.
Bad-Faith Conflict:
Characterized by personal attacks, point-scoring, and contempt.
Lacks genuine openness to alternative views.
Often escalates because the real objective isn’t finding truth or solutions but winning or dominating the conversation.
Leslie posits that many workplace disputes devolve into bad-faith conflicts simply because we lack guidelines or structures to keep them focused on issues rather than personalities. By adopting principles such as active listening, curiosity, and an agreed-upon “code of conduct,” groups can transform contentious debates into constructive dialogue.
Key Insight: Fostering a culture of good-faith debate can prevent small disagreements from turning into personal grudges—ultimately leading to richer, deeper insights for everyone involved.
4. Friction as a Problem-Solving Tool
One of the book’s more provocative arguments is that a certain level of friction is not only helpful but necessary for sustainable problem-solving. According to Leslie, when colleagues regularly test each other’s ideas, the resulting tension can force deeper analysis and more creative thinking. Teams that never experience friction may reach decisions quickly, but those decisions can be shallow or flawed.
He quotes from various organizational behavior studies showing that the best-performing teams aren’t necessarily the most harmonious; rather, they’re the ones that handle disagreements effectively. Friction—provided it remains respectful—shakes up complacency and invites each member to articulate and refine their stance. The result: a better-quality outcome that’s been rigorously stress-tested by multiple viewpoints.
Key Insight: Instead of trying to smooth over every dispute, consider how an element of friction might reveal hidden insights or force a reexamination of weak spots in a proposed idea.
5. Constructing Productive Conflict Frameworks
The final section of Conflicted offers practical frameworks for instituting productive conflict within organizations. Leslie provides tools like:
Issue-Focused Agendas: Setting an agenda that clearly states the topics for debate and the objective. Is it to decide on a product strategy? Evaluate a marketing campaign? Clarify the debate scope so personal jabs are less likely to intrude.
Roles and Moderation: Sometimes, having a designated moderator who ensures equal speaking time and steers the conversation can dramatically improve the quality of conflict. This approach helps prevent louder or more aggressive voices from dominating.
Psychological Safety: Building a culture where people feel safe voicing dissent without fear of backlash is crucial. Leslie connects this to Amy Edmondson’s research on psychological safety, showing that teams with high trust are more willing to have open disagreements—and that leads to better performance.
Real-Time Feedback Loops: Encourage participants to share immediate, constructive feedback if they feel the conversation veering into ad hominem territory. This real-time check can prevent spirals of negativity.
By implementing these structures, Leslie argues, leaders can transform chaotic or ego-driven arguments into something more like a productive “debate club,” where all parties exit the room feeling heard, respected, and—crucially—smarter.
Key Insight: Productive conflict doesn’t happen spontaneously; it requires intentional design, clear expectations, and a supporting culture that values dissent as much as consensus.
Real-World Applications
Corporate Decision-Making
Senior leadership teams often struggle with disagreements over strategic direction. By establishing ground rules, focusing on issues rather than personalities, and ensuring each viewpoint is heard, leaders can turn boardroom tensions into catalysts for robust solutions.Startup Environments
Startups live and die by their ability to iterate quickly and pivot effectively. Healthy conflict can accelerate this. Debates between a technical lead and a marketing guru, for instance, may spark a new product feature or reveal an unexploited market niche.Political Diplomacy
Leslie references real diplomatic challenges—such as peace negotiations or trade deals—that have stalled because key players either avoided conflict or used destructive tactics. A well-structured approach to conflict, on the other hand, encourages mutual understanding and opens the door to compromise.Personal Relationships
While the book zeroes in on business and organizational settings, the core principles of respectful debate, active listening, and focusing on issues rather than personal attacks can also enrich personal relationships. Family members or friends who disagree can use these tools to navigate disagreements without harming emotional bonds.
Who Should Read This Book?
Team Leaders and Managers
If you oversee a group of diverse personalities and skill sets, Conflicted provides a roadmap for turning that diversity into an asset rather than a source of friction.CEOs and Founders
Founders often wrestle with strategic decisions; the ability to lead productive conflict within a startup or scale-up can be a decisive factor in long-term success.HR Professionals and Organizational Consultants
Those responsible for culture-building and conflict resolution can glean tools to design environments where disagreements lead to progress, not resentments.Anyone Curious About Conflict Psychology
If you’re intrigued by social science research on how humans argue, negotiate, and reconcile differences, this book offers both data and anecdotes to deepen your understanding.
Conclusion
Conflicted: How Productive Disagreements Lead to Better Outcomes challenges the “conflict as chaos” narrative that pervades so many workplaces. Through engaging stories and compelling research, Ian Leslie shines a light on the transformative potential of structured, well-managed disputes. Instead of avoiding disagreements, we should view them as opportunities: opportunities to unearth new ideas, refine weak strategies, and foster deeper connections built on trust and open communication.
Of course, harnessing the power of conflict requires more than just good intentions. It demands frameworks that keep conversations on track, a culture that prizes respectful dissent, and leaders who model good-faith engagement. Yet, for teams and organizations willing to make the shift, the payoff can be enormous: decisions that better withstand scrutiny, stronger bonds forged in the fires of debate, and an environment where employees feel empowered to challenge the status quo.
The broader implication is clear: Whether in a multinational corporation or a community board meeting, learning to argue productively is a skill—and a critical one in a world full of complex problems. Reading Conflicted offers a dynamic introduction to the art and science of disagreement, revealing how the very thing we tend to shy away from might be the missing ingredient for true, sustained progress.
Business Floss is reader-supported. When you use our links we may earn an affiliate commission that helps us keep the site running. Thank you for your support!
